Couscous biologique de petit épeautre vs Couscous sarrasin
Overall, Couscous sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Couscous biologique de petit épeautre
Couscous sarrasin
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Couscous biologique de petit... | Couscous sarrasin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 3.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Couscous sarrasin has 31% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Couscous sarrasin has 76% less sugar (1 g vs 4.2 g).
- Couscous biologique de petit épeautre has 49% more fiber (8.8 g vs 4.5 g).
- Only Couscous biologique de petit épeautre lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Couscous biologique de petit épeautre
Farine de petit épeautre biologique
Couscous sarrasin
farine de sarrasin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Couscous biologique de petit épeautre or Couscous sarrasin?
Overall, Couscous sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Couscous biologique de petit épeautre has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 384 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Couscous sarrasin has less sugar: 1 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.