Comparison

Couscous à la royale vs Couscous

Overall, Couscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCouscous à la royaleCouscous
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 175 kcal 116 kcal
Fat 2 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.1 g
Sugars 3.8 g 2.8 g
Salt 0.9 g —
Fiber 3.3 g 2 g
Protein 6.8 g 4.2 g
Additives10
AllergensCelery, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Couscous has 34% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 175 kcal).
  • Couscous has 75% less fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Couscous has 26% less sugar (2.8 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Couscous à la royale has 39% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Couscous à la royale has 38% more protein (6.8 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Only Couscous à la royale lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Couscous à la royale

Semoule de blé dur précuite (GLUTEN)(77 %), flocons de soja (6 %), farine de lentilles vertes précuites (5 %), raisins secs (3 %), aromes (LAIT, CéLERI), sel, huile végétales(tournesol, coton), carottes déshydratées (1 %), maltodextrine de pomme de terre, fructose, plantes aromatiques (0,2 %), épices (0,2%), oignon déshydraté (0,07 %), poivrons rouges déshydratés (0,06 %), ail déshydraté (0,03 %), extrait de romarin. Présence de gluten, lait, soja, céleri.

Couscous

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Couscous à la royale or Couscous?

Overall, Couscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Couscous has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Couscous has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons