Comparison

Couscous à la royale vs Sémola De Trigo Gallo

Overall, Sémola De Trigo Gallo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCouscous à la royaleSémola De Trigo Gallo
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 175 kcal 344 kcal
Fat 2 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.5 g
Sugars 3.8 g 1 g
Salt 0.9 g 0 g
Fiber 3.3 g —
Protein 6.8 g 12 g
Additives10
AllergensCelery, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Couscous à la royale has 49% fewer calories (175 kcal vs 344 kcal).
  • Sémola De Trigo Gallo has 74% less sugar (1 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Sémola De Trigo Gallo has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Sémola De Trigo Gallo has 43% more protein (12 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Sémola De Trigo Gallo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Couscous à la royale lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Couscous à la royale

Semoule de blé dur précuite (GLUTEN)(77 %), flocons de soja (6 %), farine de lentilles vertes précuites (5 %), raisins secs (3 %), aromes (LAIT, CéLERI), sel, huile végétales(tournesol, coton), carottes déshydratées (1 %), maltodextrine de pomme de terre, fructose, plantes aromatiques (0,2 %), épices (0,2%), oignon déshydraté (0,07 %), poivrons rouges déshydratés (0,06 %), ail déshydraté (0,03 %), extrait de romarin. Présence de gluten, lait, soja, céleri.

Sémola De Trigo Gallo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Couscous à la royale or Sémola De Trigo Gallo?

Overall, Sémola De Trigo Gallo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Couscous à la royale has fewer calories: 175 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sémola De Trigo Gallo has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons