Comparison
Cous Cous vs Cous cous con verdure e pollo
Overall, Cous Cous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cous Cous | Cous cous con verdure e poll... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 6.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cous cous con verdure e pollo has 62% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 351 kcal).
- Cous Cous has 63% less fat (1.5 g vs 4 g).
- Cous Cous has no salt, while Cous cous con verdure e pollo has 1 g.
- Cous Cous has 48% more protein (12 g vs 6.2 g).
- Cous Cous has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cous Cous
Semolato di grano duro. Può contenere soia e senape.
Cous cous con verdure e pollo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cous Cous or Cous cous con verdure e pollo?
Overall, Cous Cous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cous cous con verdure e pollo has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cous Cous has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.