Côte de porc sans os vs Costilla de cerdo / Entrecosto de porco
Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côte de porc sans os | Costilla de cerdo / Entrecos... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 214 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 11.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 10.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côte de porc sans os has 40% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 214 kcal).
- Côte de porc sans os has 70% less fat (3.5 g vs 11.5 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has 70% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 4.3 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has no sugar, while Costilla de cerdo / Entrecosto de porco has 10.8 g.
- Côte de porc sans os has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Costilla de cerdo / Entrecosto de porco has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has 33% more protein (24 g vs 16.2 g).
- Côte de porc sans os is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Côte de porc sans os
Viande de porc (100%)
Costilla de cerdo / Entrecosto de porco
76% pork ribs, 15% smoky barbecue flavour sauce (water, sugar, tomato paste, spirit vinegar, cane molasses, cornflour, caramelised sugar syrup, smoked water, salt, garlic powder, cumin powder, onion powder, ground coriander seeds, ground black pepper, red paprika, oregano powder), 7% marinade (water, glucose syrup, salt, stabilisers: diphosphates, triphosphates, modified maize starch, acidity regulators: sodium citrates, citric acid, yeast extract), 2% barbecue flavour glaze (sugar, spices [paprika powder, onion powder, chilli pepper, black pepper, garlic powder], salt, tomato powder, maize starch, rice flour, smoke flavouring, red bell pepper, colour: paprika extract), allergy advice may contain nuts and peanuts,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côte de porc sans os or Costilla de cerdo / Entrecosto de porco?
Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côte de porc sans os has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côte de porc sans os has less sugar: 0 g versus 10.8 g per 100 g.