Côte de porc sans os vs Ribs à la Mexicaine
Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côte de porc sans os | Ribs à la Mexicaine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 223 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côte de porc sans os has 42% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 223 kcal).
- Côte de porc sans os has 77% less fat (3.5 g vs 15 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has 77% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 5.6 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has no sugar, while Ribs à la Mexicaine has 0.9 g.
- Côte de porc sans os has 88% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has 17% more protein (24 g vs 20 g).
- Côte de porc sans os is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Côte de porc sans os
Viande de porc (100%)
Ribs à la Mexicaine
Loin ribs de porc 92%, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol), épices, plantes aromatiques, arômes naturels, arôme de fumée, sel, sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, vinaigre d'alcool, Viande de porc origine France,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côte de porc sans os or Ribs à la Mexicaine?
Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côte de porc sans os has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côte de porc sans os has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.