Composée Croquante vs Rucola Slamelange
Overall, Rucola Slamelange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Composée Croquante | Rucola Slamelange |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rucola Slamelange has 84% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Composée Croquante has 33% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Rucola Slamelange has 52% more protein (2.1 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Composée Croquante
Scarole (mini 30%), frisée (mini 15%), iceberg (mini 10%), chicorée rouge (mini 5%)
Rucola Slamelange
46% lollo rosso, 34% rucola, 20% red chard.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Composée Croquante or Rucola Slamelange?
Overall, Rucola Slamelange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rucola Slamelange has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rucola Slamelange has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.