Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise surgelé vs Colin d'alaska au naturel
Overall, Colin d'alaska au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise surgelé
Colin d'alaska au naturel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d'Alaska à la bordelai... | Colin d'alaska au naturel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 119 kcal | 84 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d'alaska au naturel has 29% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 119 kcal).
- Colin d'alaska au naturel has 84% less fat (1 g vs 6.1 g).
- Colin d'alaska au naturel has 91% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Colin d'alaska au naturel has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise surgelé has 45% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise surgelé has 88% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Colin d'alaska au naturel has 42% more protein (19 g vs 11 g).
- Colin d'alaska au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise surgelé lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise surgelé
Colin d'Alaska qualité sans arête* (_poissons_) 60%, eau, échalote, beurre (_lait_), chapelure [farine de blé (_gluten_), sel, levure, poudre à lever : carbonates d'ammonium], oignon 2,3%, jus de citron à base de concentré 1,8%, huile de tournesol, persil, purée de tomate double concentrée, vin blanc concentré 0,5%, sel, poivre, épices 5 baies.
Colin d'alaska au naturel
Colin d'Alaska 76,3% (_Poisson_ - Theragra chalcogramma), eau, sel. Zone de pêche FAO : océan Pacifique Nord-Est.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise surgelé or Colin d'alaska au naturel?
Overall, Colin d'alaska au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d'alaska au naturel has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d'alaska au naturel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.