Coconut cream vs Cooking COCO 18%
Overall, Cooking COCO 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coconut cream | Cooking COCO 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 237 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 23.7 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.6 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cooking COCO 18% has 22% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 237 kcal).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 24% less fat (18 g vs 23.7 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 18% less saturated fat (16 g vs 19.6 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
- Coconut cream has 78% more protein (4 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Coconut cream
extrait de noix de coco (90%), eau, stabilisant (gomme xanthane, gomme de guar).
Cooking COCO 18%
ekstrakt z kokosa 79,1 % (woda, ekstrakt miąższu z kokosa), tłuszcz kokosowy 15,6 %, mąka tapiokowa, białka bobu, substancja zagęszczająca: pektyny, wegańskie kultury bakterii.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coconut cream or Cooking COCO 18%?
Overall, Cooking COCO 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cooking COCO 18% has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cooking COCO 18% has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.