Comparison

Classic Sauerkraut vs Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil

Overall, Classic Sauerkraut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientClassic SauerkrautBonito del norte in organic...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 36 kcal 200 kcal
Fat 0 g 12 g
Saturated fat 0 g 3.6 g
Sugars 3.6 g 0 g
Salt 2.1 g 1.6 g
Fiber 3.6 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 28 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Classic Sauerkraut has 82% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 200 kcal).
  • Classic Sauerkraut has no fat, while Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil has 12 g.
  • Classic Sauerkraut has no saturated fat, while Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil has 3.6 g.
  • Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil has no sugar, while Classic Sauerkraut has 3.6 g.
  • Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Classic Sauerkraut has 100% more fiber (3.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil has 100% more protein (28 g vs 0 g).
  • Classic Sauerkraut has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Classic Sauerkraut

Cabbage, kosher salt, caraway seed

Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil

White tuna, organic extra virgin olive oil (32%) and sea salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Classic Sauerkraut or Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil?

Overall, Classic Sauerkraut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Classic Sauerkraut has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bonito del norte in organic extra virgin olive oil has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons