Comparison

Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao vs Extra dark 93% cacao

Overall, Extra dark 93% cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat cru Fraise & Cardam...Extra dark 93% cacao
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 593 kcal 684 kcal
Fat 51.4 g 63 g
Saturated fat 30.4 g 34 g
Sugars 11.2 g 6.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 10 g
Protein 9.2 g 9 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has 13% fewer calories (593 kcal vs 684 kcal).
  • Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has 18% less fat (51.4 g vs 63 g).
  • Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has 11% less saturated fat (30.4 g vs 34 g).
  • Extra dark 93% cacao has 42% less sugar (6.5 g vs 11.2 g).
  • Extra dark 93% cacao has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Extra dark 93% cacao is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao

Chocolat noir cru biologique 80 % de cacao minimum Ingrédients 100 % biologiques: Matière sèche de cacao cru, beurre de cacao, sirop de fleur de noix de coco, fraises séchées en poudre (5%), cardamome (0,5%), lécithine de tournesol,

Extra dark 93% cacao

pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, nectar de fleur de coco séché, lucuma en poudre, vanille Bourbon, sel marin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao or Extra dark 93% cacao?

Overall, Extra dark 93% cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has fewer calories: 593 kcal versus 684 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Extra dark 93% cacao has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 11.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons