Cru et nu vs Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao
Overall, Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cru et nu | Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardam... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 658 kcal | 593 kcal |
| Fat | 54.6 g | 51.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 34.3 g | 30.4 g |
| Sugars | 24.1 g | 11.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | — |
| Protein | 7 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has 11% less saturated fat (30.4 g vs 34.3 g).
- Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has 54% less sugar (11.2 g vs 24.1 g).
- Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has 24% more protein (9.2 g vs 7 g).
- Cru et nu is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Cru et nu
beurre de cacao cru", cacao cru, sucre de coco "Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique. Fabriqué dans un atelier qui utilise des noix de pécan.
Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao
Chocolat noir cru biologique 80 % de cacao minimum Ingrédients 100 % biologiques: Matière sèche de cacao cru, beurre de cacao, sirop de fleur de noix de coco, fraises séchées en poudre (5%), cardamome (0,5%), lécithine de tournesol,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cru et nu or Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao?
Overall, Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has fewer calories: 593 kcal versus 658 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has less sugar: 11.2 g versus 24.1 g per 100 g.