Comparison

Cru et nu vs Chocolat cru Rose de Damas

Overall, Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCru et nuChocolat cru Rose de Damas
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 658 kcal 537 kcal
Fat 54.6 g 43.4 g
Saturated fat 34.3 g 27.9 g
Sugars 24.1 g 17.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 8.2 g —
Protein 7 g 11.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has 18% fewer calories (537 kcal vs 658 kcal).
  • Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has 20% less fat (43.4 g vs 54.6 g).
  • Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has 19% less saturated fat (27.9 g vs 34.3 g).
  • Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has 29% less sugar (17.1 g vs 24.1 g).
  • Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has 39% more protein (11.4 g vs 7 g).
  • Only Chocolat cru Rose de Damas lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Cru et nu

beurre de cacao cru", cacao cru, sucre de coco "Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique. Fabriqué dans un atelier qui utilise des noix de pécan.

Chocolat cru Rose de Damas

beurre et poudre de cacao cru* (80%), miel*, rose*, sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cru et nu or Chocolat cru Rose de Damas?

Overall, Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has fewer calories: 537 kcal versus 658 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has less sugar: 17.1 g versus 24.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons