Chocolat cru Rose de Damas vs Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao
Overall, Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chocolat cru Rose de Damas
Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat cru Rose de Damas | Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardam... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 537 kcal | 593 kcal |
| Fat | 43.4 g | 51.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 27.9 g | 30.4 g |
| Sugars | 17.1 g | 11.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has 15% less fat (43.4 g vs 51.4 g).
- Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has 35% less sugar (11.2 g vs 17.1 g).
- Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has 20% more protein (11.4 g vs 9.2 g).
- Chocolat cru Rose de Damas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chocolat cru Rose de Damas lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Chocolat cru Rose de Damas
beurre et poudre de cacao cru* (80%), miel*, rose*, sel
Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao
Chocolat noir cru biologique 80 % de cacao minimum Ingrédients 100 % biologiques: Matière sèche de cacao cru, beurre de cacao, sirop de fleur de noix de coco, fraises séchées en poudre (5%), cardamome (0,5%), lécithine de tournesol,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat cru Rose de Damas or Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao?
Overall, Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat cru Rose de Damas has fewer calories: 537 kcal versus 593 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat cru Fraise & Cardamome 80% cacao has less sugar: 11.2 g versus 17.1 g per 100 g.