Chili con carne vs Boulgour
Overall, Boulgour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chili con carne | Boulgour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 8.7 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chili con carne has 74% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Boulgour has 24% less fat (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Boulgour has 64% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Boulgour has 33% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Boulgour has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Boulgour has 54% more fiber (8.7 g vs 4 g).
- Boulgour has 49% more protein (13 g vs 6.6 g).
- Boulgour has the better Nutri-Score.
- Boulgour is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Boulgour lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chili con carne
Eau, haricots rouges trempés 30%, viande bovine précuite 10,5%, double concentré de tomates, tomates 4,2%, poivrons rouges 3,6%, carottes 3,6%, maïs doux 2,9%, oignons 1,8%, épices (dont piments 0,07%), sel, amidon modifié de maïs, sucre, arôme naturel, origan, arôme naturel d'ail, affermissant: chlorure de calcium. Pourcentages exprimés par rapport au poids net total. Elaboré à partir de viande bovine origine France.
Boulgour
BLÉ dur précuit concassé
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chili con carne or Boulgour?
Overall, Boulgour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chili con carne has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boulgour has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.