Chickpea Fusilli Pasta vs Nature Pasta de Garbanzo
Overall, Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chickpea Fusilli Pasta | Nature Pasta de Garbanzo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 10.8 g |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has 31% less fat (4.5 g vs 6.5 g).
- Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has no saturated fat, while Nature Pasta de Garbanzo has 0.9 g.
- Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has 42% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3.1 g).
- Nature Pasta de Garbanzo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chickpea Fusilli Pasta
CHICKPEAS, TAPIOCA FLOUR, GUAR GUM
Nature Pasta de Garbanzo
100% harina de garbanzo. OUR
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chickpea Fusilli Pasta or Nature Pasta de Garbanzo?
Overall, Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.