Comparison

Chicken Lo Mein vs Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding

Overall, Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChicken Lo MeinLapskaus Grønnsaksblanding
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 125 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 2.9 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0 g
Sugars 4.8 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.6 g —
Fiber 1.5 g 1.8 g
Protein 5.2 g 1.7 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, Sesame seeds, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has 49% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 125 kcal).
  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has 93% less fat (0.2 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has no saturated fat, while Chicken Lo Mein has 0.4 g.
  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has 54% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has 18% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Chicken Lo Mein has 67% more protein (5.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Only Chicken Lo Mein lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chicken Lo Mein

Enriched macaroni product, water, cooked white chicken, soy sauce, broccoli, red bell peppers, carrots, brown sugar, canola oil, garlic, ginger puree, modified food starch, rice wine vinegar, shiitake extract, spice, toasted sesame oil, xanthan gum. Contains sesame, soy, wheat.

Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding

Potet 65 %, gulrot 20 %, selleri 8 % og purre 7 %.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chicken Lo Mein or Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding?

Overall, Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons