Comparison

Spicy Ginger Garlic Edamame vs Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding

Overall, Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSpicy Ginger Garlic EdamameLapskaus Grønnsaksblanding
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 135 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 4.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0 g
Sugars 3.4 g 2.2 g
Salt 1.1 g —
Fiber 8.4 g 1.8 g
Protein 10.7 g 1.7 g
Additives10
AllergensSesame seeds, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has 53% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 135 kcal).
  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has 96% less fat (0.2 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has no saturated fat, while Spicy Ginger Garlic Edamame has 0.8 g.
  • Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has 35% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Spicy Ginger Garlic Edamame has 79% more fiber (8.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Spicy Ginger Garlic Edamame has 84% more protein (10.7 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Only Spicy Ginger Garlic Edamame lists: Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Spicy Ginger Garlic Edamame

Soybeans, Gluten Free Soy Sauce (water, soybeans, cornstarch, salt), garlic purée, ginger purée, water, soybean oil, sesame oil, sugar, spices (dried red chili flakes, chili powder, ginger powder), lemon juice, xanthan gum. Contains: soy, sesame.

Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding

Potet 65 %, gulrot 20 %, selleri 8 % og purre 7 %.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Spicy Ginger Garlic Edamame or Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding?

Overall, Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 135 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lapskaus Grønnsaksblanding has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons