Comparison

Chia Pudding with Raspberries vs Chia good mango

Overall, Chia good mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChia Pudding with Raspberrie...Chia good mango
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 126 kcal 99 kcal
Fat 6 g 7.9 g
Saturated fat 5.4 g 5 g
Sugars 7.9 g 3.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 1.6 g 2.8 g
Protein 0.9 g 1.8 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chia good mango has 22% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 126 kcal).
  • Chia Pudding with Raspberries has 24% less fat (6 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Chia good mango has 53% less sugar (3.7 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Chia good mango has 44% more fiber (2.8 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Chia good mango has 50% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.9 g).

Ingredients

Chia Pudding with Raspberries

Woda, wsad owocowy z malin 22% (maliny 50%, woda, cukier, skrobia modyfikowana kukurydziana, koncentrat z marchwi, koncentrat z aronii, koncentrat z winogron, regulator kwasowości: kwas cytrynowy, aromat, substancja konserwująca: sorbinian potasu), napój kokosowy 21 % (ekstrakt z kokosa 85 %, woda), sok jabłkowy 5 %, nasiona szałwii hiszpańskiej (Salvia hispanica) 3,3 %, cukier, skrobia modyfikowana kukurydziana, substancja zagęszczająca: karagen.

Chia good mango

VESI, KOOKOSVESI, MANGO 20% KOOKOSMAJTO, CHIA 7,5%, TAPIOKATARKKELYS, SITRUUNATAYSMEHUTIIVISTE, LUONTAISET AROMIT, MERISUOLA.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chia Pudding with Raspberries or Chia good mango?

Overall, Chia good mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chia good mango has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chia good mango has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons