Comparison

Carpaccio di polpo vs Polpo cotto al naturale

Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Carpaccio di polpo	Polpo cotto al naturale
Nutri-Score	b	a
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	95 kcal	77 kcal
Fat	1 g	1.5 g
Saturated fat	0.4 g	0.5 g
Sugars	1.4 g	0 g
Salt	1.5 g	0.8 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	20 g	15 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Polpo cotto al naturale has 19% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 95 kcal).
Carpaccio di polpo has 33% less fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
Polpo cotto al naturale has no sugar, while Carpaccio di polpo has 1.4 g.
Polpo cotto al naturale has 47% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
Carpaccio di polpo has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
Polpo cotto al naturale has the better Nutri-Score.
Only Polpo cotto al naturale lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Carpaccio di polpo

Not available.

Polpo cotto al naturale

Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua

FAQ

Which is healthier: Carpaccio di polpo or Polpo cotto al naturale?

Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Polpo cotto al naturale has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Poulpe Ail et Persil vs Polpo cotto al naturale Pulpoarme vs Polpo cotto al naturale Oktopus-Salat vs Polpo cotto al naturale Polvo em azeite vs Polpo cotto al naturale Polpo cotto al naturale vs Poulpe cuisiné à la gali... Polipetti alla Luciana vs Polpo cotto al naturale Polpo cotto al naturale vs Tentacoli di polpo cotto...