Polipetti alla Luciana vs Polpo cotto al naturale
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polipetti alla Luciana | Polpo cotto al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 212 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 64% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 212 kcal).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 88% less fat (1.5 g vs 13 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 79% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.4 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has no sugar, while Polipetti alla Luciana has 3.6 g.
- Polipetti alla Luciana has no salt, while Polpo cotto al naturale has 0.8 g.
- Polipetti alla Luciana has 21% more protein (19 g vs 15 g).
- Only Polpo cotto al naturale lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Polipetti alla Luciana
Polpa di pomodoro 50%, POLPO indopacifico 40%, olive verdi, olio extravergine di oliva, vino bianco, olio di girasole, sale, aglio, prezzemolo
Polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polipetti alla Luciana or Polpo cotto al naturale?
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 212 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polpo cotto al naturale has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.