Comparison

California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	California Rolls Makis	Maki saumon
Nutri-Score	c	c
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	158 kcal	176 kcal
Fat	4.1 g	3.7 g
Saturated fat	0.6 g	0.8 g
Sugars	1.9 g	3.9 g
Salt	1.9 g	1 g
Protein	6.3 g	8.4 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

California Rolls Makis has 10% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 176 kcal).
California Rolls Makis has 51% less sugar (1.9 g vs 3.9 g).
Maki saumon has 48% less salt (1 g vs 1.9 g).
Maki saumon has 25% more protein (8.4 g vs 6.3 g).

Ingredients

California Rolls Makis

Not available.

Maki saumon

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: California Rolls Makis or Maki saumon?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

California Rolls Makis has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 176 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

California Rolls Makis has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Maki saumon vs Smoked salmon sushi snac... California Rolls Makis vs Smoked salmon sushi snac... Maki saumon vs Maki saumon Maki saumon 6 vs Maki saumon Maki California Thon Avo... vs Maki saumon California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon 6 California Rolls Makis vs Maki California Thon Avo... California Rolls Makis vs Maki