Comparison
California Rolls Makis vs Maki
Overall, California Rolls Makis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | California Rolls Makis | Maki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 4.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- California Rolls Makis has 74% less sugar (1.9 g vs 7.4 g).
- California Rolls Makis has 27% more protein (6.3 g vs 4.6 g).
- California Rolls Makis has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
California Rolls Makis
Not available.
Maki
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: California Rolls Makis or Maki?
Overall, California Rolls Makis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
California Rolls Makis has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
California Rolls Makis has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
California Rolls Makis vs Smoked salmon sushi snac...
Maki vs Smoked salmon sushi snac...
California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon
Maki vs Maki saumon
California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon 6
California Rolls Makis vs Maki California Thon Avo...
California Rolls Makis vs Maki California Tonno Ma...
Maki vs Maki saumon 6