Comparison

California Rolls Makis vs Smoked salmon sushi snack

Overall, Smoked salmon sushi snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCalifornia Rolls MakisSmoked salmon sushi snack
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 158 kcal 151 kcal
Fat 4.1 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1.9 g 3.5 g
Salt 1.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 1 g
Protein 6.3 g 5.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish, Milk, Sesame seeds, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Smoked salmon sushi snack has 39% less fat (2.5 g vs 4.1 g).
  • California Rolls Makis has 46% less sugar (1.9 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Smoked salmon sushi snack has 41% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Only Smoked salmon sushi snack lists: Fish, Milk, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

California Rolls Makis

Not available.

Smoked salmon sushi snack

SUSHI RICE (66%) (Water, White Rice, Rice Vinegar, Sugar Spirit Vinegar, Rapeseed Oil, Salt), Low Fat Soft Cheese (Low Fat Soft Cheese (Milk), Cornflour, Salt), SMOKED SALMON (10%) (Salmon (Salma salar) (Fish), Salt, Sugar), Cucumber, Soy Sauce (Water, Soya Bean, Salt, Rice Vinegar), Nori Seaweed, Black Sesame Seeds

FAQ

Which is healthier: California Rolls Makis or Smoked salmon sushi snack?

Overall, Smoked salmon sushi snack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Smoked salmon sushi snack has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

California Rolls Makis has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons