Comparison
California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon 6
Overall, Maki saumon 6 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | California Rolls Makis | Maki saumon 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 6.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maki saumon 6 has 22% less fat (3.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Maki saumon 6 has 74% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Maki saumon 6 has 51% less salt (1 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
California Rolls Makis
Not available.
Maki saumon 6
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: California Rolls Makis or Maki saumon 6?
Overall, Maki saumon 6 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
California Rolls Makis has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maki saumon 6 has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
California Rolls Makis vs Smoked salmon sushi snac...
Maki saumon 6 vs Smoked salmon sushi snac...
California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon
Maki saumon 6 vs Maki saumon
California Rolls Makis vs Maki California Thon Avo...
California Rolls Makis vs Maki
California Rolls Makis vs Maki California Tonno Ma...
Maki California Thon Avo... vs Maki saumon 6