Comparison

Maki California Thon Avocat vs Maki saumon 6

Overall, Maki saumon 6 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMaki California Thon AvocatMaki saumon 6
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 187 kcal 159 kcal
Fat 9.2 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.5 g
Sugars 3 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.4 g 1 g
Fiber 1.1 g —
Protein 6.5 g 6.5 g
Additives20
AllergensFish, Mustard, Sesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Maki saumon 6 has 15% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 187 kcal).
  • Maki saumon 6 has 65% less fat (3.2 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Maki saumon 6 has 67% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Maki saumon 6 has 83% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Maki California Thon Avocat has 55% less salt (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Only Maki California Thon Avocat lists: Fish, Mustard, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Maki California Thon Avocat

Riz vinaigré [eau, riz, vinaigre à sushi [vinaigre d'alcool, sucre, sel, extrait de kelp], jus de citron, huile de tournesol, sel], mélange thon mayo [thon cuit [thon (poisson), eau, sel], mayonnaise [huile de colza, eau, sirop de glucose-fructose, vinaigre d'alcool, amidon modifié, sel, graines de moutarde, stabilisant : E415, épices]], avocat, sésame blanc, algues. Peut contenir : soja, œuf, céleri, crustacés, céréales contenant du gluten, fruits à coque, lait, arachide, sulfites.

Maki saumon 6

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Maki California Thon Avocat or Maki saumon 6?

Overall, Maki saumon 6 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Maki saumon 6 has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Maki saumon 6 has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons