Comparison
Maki vs Maki saumon
Overall, Maki saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maki | Maki saumon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 164 kcal | 171 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 4.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 7.4 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maki has 20% less fat (3.7 g vs 4.6 g).
- Maki has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Maki saumon has 61% less sugar (2.9 g vs 7.4 g).
- Maki saumon has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Maki saumon has 45% more protein (8.4 g vs 4.6 g).
- Maki saumon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Maki
Not available.
Maki saumon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maki or Maki saumon?
Overall, Maki saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maki has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 171 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maki saumon has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.