Comparison
California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon
Overall, Maki saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | California Rolls Makis | Maki saumon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 171 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 4.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- California Rolls Makis has 11% less fat (4.1 g vs 4.6 g).
- California Rolls Makis has 33% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- California Rolls Makis has 34% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.9 g).
- Maki saumon has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Maki saumon has 25% more protein (8.4 g vs 6.3 g).
- Maki saumon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
California Rolls Makis
Not available.
Maki saumon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: California Rolls Makis or Maki saumon?
Overall, Maki saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
California Rolls Makis has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 171 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
California Rolls Makis has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Maki saumon vs Smoked salmon sushi snac...
California Rolls Makis vs Smoked salmon sushi snac...
Maki saumon vs Maki saumon
California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon
Maki California Thon Avo... vs Maki saumon
Maki vs Maki saumon
Maki saumon vs Maki California Tonno Ma...
California Rolls Makis vs Maki saumon 6