Comparison

Buchweizen vs For Breakfast Gluten Free Buckwheat Toasted Muesli

Overall, Buchweizen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBuchweizenFor Breakfast Gluten Free Bu...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 346 kcal 482 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 29.1 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 7.4 g
Sugars 0 g 15.3 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.7 g 7.8 g
Protein 9.8 g 12.3 g
Additives00
AllergensLupinNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Buchweizen has 28% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 482 kcal).
  • Buchweizen has 94% less fat (1.7 g vs 29.1 g).
  • Buchweizen has 95% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Buchweizen has no sugar, while For Breakfast Gluten Free Buckwheat Toasted Muesli has 15.3 g.
  • For Breakfast Gluten Free Buckwheat Toasted Muesli has 53% more fiber (7.8 g vs 3.7 g).
  • For Breakfast Gluten Free Buckwheat Toasted Muesli has 20% more protein (12.3 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Buchweizen has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Buchweizen lists: Lupin.

Ingredients

Buchweizen

Buchweizen* *aus Demeter Bio-Landbau Kann Spuren von Gluten, Soja, Senf, Sesam und Lupine enthalten.

For Breakfast Gluten Free Buckwheat Toasted Muesli

Sunflower seeds 35%, buckwheat 18%, sultanas 10% (sunflowers, sunflower oil), shredded coconut 6%, pumpkin seeds 5%, honey, linseed 4%, crisped rice (rice), raisins 4% (raisins, sunflower oil), chicory root fibre, rapeseed oil, cinnamon 0.2%

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buchweizen or For Breakfast Gluten Free Buckwheat Toasted Muesli?

Overall, Buchweizen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Buchweizen has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Buchweizen has less sugar: 0 g versus 15.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons