Comparison
Brotes de rúcula vs Un toque de guisantes
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brotes de rúcula | Un toque de guisantes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brotes de rúcula has 61% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- Brotes de rúcula has 81% less sugar (0.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
- Un toque de guisantes has 79% more fiber (6.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Un toque de guisantes has 38% more protein (5.3 g vs 3.3 g).
- Brotes de rúcula is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Brotes de rúcula
Rúcula.
Un toque de guisantes
Garden peas, water, salt, natural flavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brotes de rúcula or Un toque de guisantes?
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brotes de rúcula has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brotes de rúcula has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Brotes de rúcula vs Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3
Un toque de guisantes vs Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3
Brotes de rúcula vs Aceitunas partidas aliña...
Un toque de guisantes vs Aceitunas partidas aliña...
Brotes de rúcula vs Bio maíz
Un toque de guisantes vs Bio maíz
Brotes de rúcula vs Judías verdes extrafinas
Brotes de rúcula vs Tomate Frito