Comparison

Breaded haddock fillets vs Filetti di merluzzo

Overall, Filetti di merluzzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBreaded haddock filletsFiletti di merluzzo
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 218 kcal 76 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.3 g 0 g
Protein 13 g 17 g
Additives10
AllergensFish, GlutenFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetti di merluzzo has 65% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 218 kcal).
  • Filetti di merluzzo has 90% less fat (0.9 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Filetti di merluzzo has 73% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Filetti di merluzzo has no sugar, while Breaded haddock fillets has 0.6 g.
  • Filetti di merluzzo has 78% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Breaded haddock fillets has 100% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Filetti di merluzzo has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
  • Filetti di merluzzo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Filetti di merluzzo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Breaded haddock fillets lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Breaded haddock fillets

Haddock Fortified wheat flour Water Rapeseed oil Durum wheat semolina Maize starch Wheat gluten Salt Yeast extract Onion powder Yeast Wheat flour Cider vinegar Garlic powder Black pepper Black pepper extract Colour Paprika extract

Filetti di merluzzo

merluzzo atlantico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Breaded haddock fillets or Filetti di merluzzo?

Overall, Filetti di merluzzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetti di merluzzo has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 218 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di merluzzo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons