Comparison

Bordelaise vs Filetti di merluzzo

Overall, Filetti di merluzzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Bordelaise	Filetti di merluzzo
Nutri-Score	b	a
NOVA group	—	1
Calories	146 kcal	76 kcal
Fat	8.1 g	0.9 g
Saturated fat	2 g	0.2 g
Sugars	0.5 g	0 g
Salt	1.1 g	0.2 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	13 g	17 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	Fish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Filetti di merluzzo has 48% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 146 kcal).
Filetti di merluzzo has 89% less fat (0.9 g vs 8.1 g).
Filetti di merluzzo has 90% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2 g).
Filetti di merluzzo has no sugar, while Bordelaise has 0.5 g.
Filetti di merluzzo has 82% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
Filetti di merluzzo has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
Filetti di merluzzo has the better Nutri-Score.
Only Filetti di merluzzo lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Bordelaise

Not available.

Filetti di merluzzo

merluzzo atlantico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bordelaise or Filetti di merluzzo?

Overall, Filetti di merluzzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetti di merluzzo has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di merluzzo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Thon Albacore vs Filetti di merluzzo Thon Albacore vs Bordelaise Breaded haddock fillets vs Filetti di merluzzo Breaded haddock fillets vs Bordelaise Deluxe Extra Large Beer... vs Filetti di merluzzo Deluxe Extra Large Beer... vs Bordelaise Lidl Haddock Fillets vs Filetti di merluzzo Lidl Haddock Fillets vs Bordelaise