Thon Albacore vs Bordelaise
Overall, Thon Albacore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon Albacore | Bordelaise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 8.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thon Albacore has 30% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 146 kcal).
- Thon Albacore has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.1 g).
- Thon Albacore has 90% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Thon Albacore has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Thon Albacore has 46% more protein (24 g vs 13 g).
- Thon Albacore has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Thon Albacore lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Thon Albacore
Yellowfin tuna (FISH) boneless*. Wild Thunnus albacares caught using purse seines and lift nets in the western Indian Ocean (FAO 51).
Bordelaise
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon Albacore or Bordelaise?
Overall, Thon Albacore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thon Albacore has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thon Albacore has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.