Thon Albacore vs Filetti di merluzzo
Overall, Thon Albacore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon Albacore | Filetti di merluzzo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetti di merluzzo has 25% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 102 kcal).
- Thon Albacore has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Filetti di merluzzo has no sugar, while Thon Albacore has 0.5 g.
- Thon Albacore has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Thon Albacore has 29% more protein (24 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Thon Albacore
Yellowfin tuna (FISH) boneless*. Wild Thunnus albacares caught using purse seines and lift nets in the western Indian Ocean (FAO 51).
Filetti di merluzzo
merluzzo atlantico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon Albacore or Filetti di merluzzo?
Overall, Thon Albacore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetti di merluzzo has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 102 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetti di merluzzo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.