Lidl Haddock Fillets vs Bordelaise
Overall, Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lidl Haddock Fillets | Bordelaise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 8.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bordelaise has 29% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 204 kcal).
- Bordelaise has 20% less fat (8.1 g vs 10.2 g).
- Lidl Haddock Fillets has 60% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Bordelaise has 72% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Bordelaise has 29% more protein (13 g vs 9.2 g).
- Bordelaise has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Lidl Haddock Fillets lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Lidl Haddock Fillets
Haddock 52% (FISH) Batter (Wheat flour [WHEAT flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Potato Starch, Rice Flour, Maize Flour, WHEAT Starch, Salt, Dextrose, Sunflower Oil, Palm Oil, Skimmed MILK Powder, MUSTARD, Raising Agents (Diphosphates, Sodium Carbonates, Ammonium carbonates), Flavouring, Black Pepper), Rapeseed Oil.
Bordelaise
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lidl Haddock Fillets or Bordelaise?
Overall, Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bordelaise has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bordelaise has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.