Comparison

Breaded Cooked Ham Slices vs Cooked Ham

Overall, Cooked Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBreaded Cooked Ham SlicesCooked Ham
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 118 kcal 93 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.7 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.7 g
Protein 21.1 g 17.9 g
Additives69
AllergensGluten, PorkPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cooked Ham has 21% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 118 kcal).
  • Cooked Ham has 35% less fat (2.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Cooked Ham has 41% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Breaded Cooked Ham Slices has 15% more protein (21.1 g vs 17.9 g).
  • Only Breaded Cooked Ham Slices lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Breaded Cooked Ham Slices

Pork, Salt, Breadcrumbs (Fortified Wheat Flour (_Wheat_ Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Salt, Yeast, Colours (Paprika Extract, Curcumin)), Sugar, Stabilisers (Triphosphates), Pork Gelatine, Antioxidant (Sodium Ascorbate), Preservative (Sodium Nitrite).

Cooked Ham

Pork 88%, Water, Salt, Dextrose, Stabilisers (Potassium Triphosphate, Sodium Triphosphate, Tetrapotassium Diphosphate), Mineral Sea Salt, Honey, Brown Sugar, Antioxidants (Sodium Ascorbate), Gluten Free Breadcrumbs (Rice Flour, Cornflour, Salt, Dextrose, Rapeseed Oil, Colours (Curcumin, Paprika)), Preservative (Sodium Nitrite), Pork Gelatine, Caramelised Sugar Syrup.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Breaded Cooked Ham Slices or Cooked Ham?

Overall, Cooked Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cooked Ham has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 118 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cooked Ham has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons