Comparison

Boutargue classique vs Polpa di granchio

Overall, Polpa di granchio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Boutargue classique	Polpa di granchio
Nutri-Score	e	a
NOVA group	3	—
Calories	406 kcal	70 kcal
Fat	27.1 g	0.5 g
Saturated fat	6.5 g	0 g
Sugars	0.8 g	0 g
Salt	4.4 g	0.7 g
Fiber	1.1 g	—
Protein	39.1 g	14 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Polpa di granchio has 83% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 406 kcal).
Polpa di granchio has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 27.1 g).
Polpa di granchio has no saturated fat, while Boutargue classique has 6.5 g.
Polpa di granchio has no sugar, while Boutargue classique has 0.8 g.
Polpa di granchio has 83% less salt (0.7 g vs 4.4 g).
Boutargue classique has 64% more protein (39.1 g vs 14 g).
Polpa di granchio has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Boutargue classique

œufs de mulet, sel.

Polpa di granchio

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Boutargue classique or Polpa di granchio?

Overall, Polpa di granchio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Polpa di granchio has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Polpa di granchio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Polpa di granchio vs Bottarga di tonno Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di granchio Bottarga di muggine vs Polpa di granchio Polpa di granchio vs Polpa di riccio di mare Boutargue classique vs Nero di seppia Boutargue classique vs Bottarga di tonno Boutargue Classique vs Polpa di granchio Boutargue classique vs Salmone affumicato