Comparison
Boutargue classique vs Salmone affumicato
Overall, Salmone affumicato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boutargue classique | Salmone affumicato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 406 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 27.1 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 4.4 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 39.1 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salmone affumicato has 70% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 406 kcal).
- Salmone affumicato has 90% less fat (2.6 g vs 27.1 g).
- Salmone affumicato has 91% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 6.5 g).
- Salmone affumicato has 33% less salt (2.9 g vs 4.4 g).
- Boutargue classique has 39% more protein (39.1 g vs 24 g).
- Salmone affumicato has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Boutargue classique
œufs de mulet, sel.
Salmone affumicato
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boutargue classique or Salmone affumicato?
Overall, Salmone affumicato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salmone affumicato has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boutargue classique has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bottarga di muggine vs Salmone affumicato
Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di riccio di mare
Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di granchio
Boutargue Classique vs Salmone affumicato
Boutargue classique vs Nero di seppia
Boutargue classique vs Bottarga di tonno
Boutargue classique vs Bottarga di muggine
Boutargue classique vs Polpa di riccio di mare