Comparison

Bottarga di muggine vs Salmone affumicato

Overall, Salmone affumicato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Bottarga di muggine	Salmone affumicato
Nutri-Score	e	d
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	427 kcal	123 kcal
Fat	27 g	2.6 g
Saturated fat	6.9 g	0.6 g
Sugars	0 g	0.8 g
Salt	4 g	2.9 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	43 g	24 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Salmone affumicato has 71% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 427 kcal).
Salmone affumicato has 90% less fat (2.6 g vs 27 g).
Salmone affumicato has 91% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 6.9 g).
Bottarga di muggine has no sugar, while Salmone affumicato has 0.8 g.
Salmone affumicato has 28% less salt (2.9 g vs 4 g).
Bottarga di muggine has 44% more protein (43 g vs 24 g).
Salmone affumicato has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bottarga di muggine

Not available.

Salmone affumicato

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bottarga di muggine or Salmone affumicato?

Overall, Salmone affumicato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salmone affumicato has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 427 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bottarga di muggine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Bottarga di muggine vs Bottarga di tonno Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di riccio di mare Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di granchio Boutargue Classique vs Salmone affumicato Bottarga di muggine vs Polpa di riccio di mare Bottarga di muggine vs Polpa di granchio Boutargue Classique vs Bottarga di muggine Boutargue classique vs Salmone affumicato