Comparison
Bottarga di muggine vs Polpa di granchio
Overall, Polpa di granchio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bottarga di muggine | Polpa di granchio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 427 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 43 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpa di granchio has 84% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 427 kcal).
- Polpa di granchio has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 27 g).
- Polpa di granchio has no saturated fat, while Bottarga di muggine has 6.9 g.
- Polpa di granchio has 82% less salt (0.7 g vs 4 g).
- Bottarga di muggine has 67% more protein (43 g vs 14 g).
- Polpa di granchio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bottarga di muggine
Not available.
Polpa di granchio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bottarga di muggine or Polpa di granchio?
Overall, Polpa di granchio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpa di granchio has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 427 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bottarga di muggine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bottarga di muggine vs Bottarga di tonno
Polpa di granchio vs Bottarga di tonno
Bottarga di muggine vs Salmone affumicato
Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di granchio
Bottarga di muggine vs Polpa di riccio di mare
Boutargue Classique vs Bottarga di muggine
Polpa di granchio vs Polpa di riccio di mare
Boutargue Classique vs Polpa di granchio