Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets vs Filet de haddock
Overall, Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets
Filet de haddock
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boneless Smoked Haddock Fill... | Filet de haddock |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.3 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de haddock has 20% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 96 kcal).
- Filet de haddock has 57% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Filet de haddock has no saturated fat, while Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has 0.3 g.
- Filet de haddock has no sugar, while Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has 0.5 g.
- Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has 63% less salt (1.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has 11% more protein (20.3 g vs 18 g).
- Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) (Fish) (98%), Salt, Colours: Curcumin, Paprika Extract.
Filet de haddock
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets or Filet de haddock?
Overall, Boneless Smoked Haddock Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de haddock has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de haddock has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.