Comparison

Filet de haddock vs Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets

Overall, Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de haddockWild Caught Smoked Haddock F...
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 77 kcal 98 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.1 g
Salt 3.2 g 1.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 18 g 23.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de haddock has 21% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 98 kcal).
  • Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets has 50% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets has 52% less salt (1.5 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets has 23% more protein (23.5 g vs 18 g).
  • Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de haddock

Not available.

Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets

98% Haddock (Fish), Salt, Colour: Curcumin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de haddock or Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets?

Overall, Wild Caught Smoked Haddock Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de haddock has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 98 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de haddock has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons