Comparison

Blé, riz rouge, quinoa vs Céréales méditerranéennes

Overall, Blé, riz rouge, quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBlé, riz rouge, quinoaCéréales méditerranéennes
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 159 kcal 146 kcal
Fat 2.9 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0 g 2 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.7 g
Fiber 4.8 g 2.7 g
Protein 4.9 g 4.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Céréales méditerranéennes has 52% less fat (1.4 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Blé, riz rouge, quinoa has no sugar, while Céréales méditerranéennes has 2 g.
  • Blé, riz rouge, quinoa has 44% more fiber (4.8 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Blé, riz rouge, quinoa is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Blé, riz rouge, quinoa

Eau, blé mondé précuit 23,7%, riz rouge complet 9,3%, quinoa 8%, huile de tournesol, sel de mer.

Céréales méditerranéennes

Semoule de blé dur précuite (gluten) (52%), céréales complètes (30%) (semoule de blé dur complète précuite (gluten) (20%), flocons de seigle malté (gluten) (6,3%), flocons d'orge (gluten) (3%), flocons d'épeautre (gluten) (1%), semoule de mais précuite (6,5%), arôme naturel, farine de blé précuite (gluten) (1,8%), sel, tomates déshydratées, poivrons rouges déshydratés, huile d'olive vierge extra (0,9%), ail (0,9%), persil déshydraté (0,75%), huile de tournesol, herbes de Provence (0,1%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Blé, riz rouge, quinoa or Céréales méditerranéennes?

Overall, Blé, riz rouge, quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Céréales méditerranéennes has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Blé, riz rouge, quinoa has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons