Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten vs Salmon ahumado
Overall, Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
Salmon ahumado
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Räucherlachs, trockenges... | Salmon ahumado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 144 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 18.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Lachs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salmon ahumado has 39% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has 19% less salt (2.6 g vs 3.2 g).
- Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Salmon ahumado lists: Lachs.
Ingredients
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
97% zalm (_vis_), zout, beukenhoutrook
Salmon ahumado
_Lachs_, Speisesalz, Säureregulator: Natriumlactat, Buchenholzrauch,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten or Salmon ahumado?
Overall, Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salmon ahumado has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.