Comparison

Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten vs Norwegischer Räucherlachs in Scheiben

Overall, Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio-Räucherlachs, trockenges...Norwegischer Räucherlachs in...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 154 kcal 174 kcal
Fat 8 g 10 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 2.6 g 3 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20.5 g 21 g
Additives01
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has 11% fewer calories (154 kcal vs 174 kcal).
  • Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has 20% less fat (8 g vs 10 g).
  • Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has 13% less salt (2.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten

97% zalm (_vis_), zout, beukenhoutrook

Norwegischer Räucherlachs in Scheiben

Lachs, Salz, Säureregulator: Natriumlactat; Buchenholzrauch.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten or Norwegischer Räucherlachs in Scheiben?

Overall, Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons