Salmon ahumado en lonchas vs Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
Overall, Salmon ahumado en lonchas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Salmon ahumado en lonchas
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salmon ahumado en lonchas | Bio-Räucherlachs, trockenges... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 162 kcal | 154 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 20.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has 11% less fat (8 g vs 9 g).
- Salmon ahumado en lonchas has 22% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Salmon ahumado en lonchas has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.6 g).
- Salmon ahumado en lonchas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Salmon ahumado en lonchas
95% salmón, sal, corrector de acidez: lactato sódico; humo de madera de haya.
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
97% zalm (_vis_), zout, beukenhoutrook
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salmon ahumado en lonchas or Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten?
Overall, Salmon ahumado en lonchas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 162 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salmon ahumado en lonchas has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.