Comparison
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten vs Saumon Fumé
Overall, Saumon Fumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Räucherlachs, trockenges... | Saumon Fumé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 145 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 18.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saumon Fumé has 39% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
97% zalm (_vis_), zout, beukenhoutrook
Saumon Fumé
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten or Saumon Fumé?
Overall, Saumon Fumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saumon Fumé has fewer calories: 145 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Salmon ahumado en loncha... vs Saumon Fumé
Saumon Fumé Bio vs Bio-Räucherlachs, trocke...
Saumon Fumé Bio vs Saumon Fumé
Bio-Räucherlachs, trocke... vs Taquitos de salmón ahuma...
Saumon Fumé vs Taquitos de salmón ahuma...
Bio-Räucherlachs, trocke... vs Norwegischer Räucherlach...
Norwegischer Räucherlach... vs Saumon Fumé
Bio-Räucherlachs, trocke... vs Smoked Salmon