Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten vs Smoked Salmon
Overall, Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
Smoked Salmon
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Räucherlachs, trockenges... | Smoked Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 183 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 11.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 19.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has 16% fewer calories (154 kcal vs 183 kcal).
- Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has 31% less fat (8 g vs 11.5 g).
- Only Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten
97% zalm (_vis_), zout, beukenhoutrook
Smoked Salmon
somon
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten or Smoked Salmon?
Overall, Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 183 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Räucherlachs, trockengesalzen, in Scheiben geschnitten has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.