Comparison
Bio Berlinsen vs Urid Dal Chilka
Overall, Urid Dal Chilka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Berlinsen | Urid Dal Chilka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 338 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 16 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Urid Dal Chilka has 38% less fat (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Bio Berlinsen has 76% less sugar (1.7 g vs 7 g).
- Urid Dal Chilka has 13% more fiber (16 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Bio Berlinsen
BIO BERGLINSEN*. *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau
Urid Dal Chilka
Black Lentils
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Berlinsen or Urid Dal Chilka?
Overall, Urid Dal Chilka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Berlinsen has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Berlinsen has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 7 g per 100 g.