Comparison

Beef goulash vs Gulasch-Suppe

Overall, Gulasch-Suppe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBeef goulashGulasch-Suppe
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 119 kcal 52 kcal
Fat 6.6 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 1.5 g 2.5 g
Salt 1.4 g 1 g
Fiber 1.3 g 1.2 g
Protein 11 g 4.3 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gulasch-Suppe has 56% fewer calories (52 kcal vs 119 kcal).
  • Gulasch-Suppe has 82% less fat (1.2 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Gulasch-Suppe has 94% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Beef goulash has 38% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Gulasch-Suppe has 30% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Beef goulash has 61% more protein (11 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Gulasch-Suppe has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Gulasch-Suppe is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Beef goulash lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Beef goulash

Water, cooked beef, reconstituted tomato (water, tomato paste), beef tallow, wheat flour, salt, paprika, onion, spices, garlic, sugar, vinegar, monosodium glutamate.

Gulasch-Suppe

Wasser, gegartes Rindfleisch¹ 13% (Rindfleisch¹, Meersalz), Tomatenmark1, Zwiebeln¹ 9,8%, Paprika¹ 8,9%, Karotten¹ 6,2%, Maisstärke, Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl, Gewürze, Rohrohrzucker, Apfelessig, Verdickungsmittel (Guarkernmehl1). laus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Weizen, Ei, Milch und Sellerie enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Beef goulash or Gulasch-Suppe?

Overall, Gulasch-Suppe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gulasch-Suppe has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Beef goulash has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons